Statement of Purpose | Introductory Remarks | ExpertPanel | Archives | Project Home

RELATED READINGS

Australian Science, Technology and Engineering Council (ASTEC) (1994),Matching Science and Technology to Future Needs: Background Report ASTEC,Canberra. (Australia).

ASTEC (1994) Matching Science and Technology to Future Needs: InternationalPerspective, AGPS, Canberra. (Australia).

ASTEC (1996), Developing Long-Term Strategies for Science and Technology inAustralia: Findings of the Study: Matching Science and Technology to Future Needs2010, AGPS, Canberra. (Australia).

ASTEC (1996), Developing Long-Term Strategies for Science and Technology inAustralia: Outcomes of the Study: Matching Science and Technology to Future Needs2010, AGPS, Canberra. (Australia).

Bourke, P. and Butler L (1995), Recent Foresight Studies: Implications forAustralia, ASTEC commissioned study, Performance Indicators Project,Australian National University,  Canberra. (Australia).

Bundesministerium fur Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie (BNMF)(1996), Delphi-Bericht 1995 zur Entwicklung von Wissenschaft und Technik,BMBF, Bonn. (Germany/Japan)

Foresight Steering Committee (1996), A Vital Knowledge System: Dutch Researchwith a View to the Future, Foresight Steering Committee, Amsterdam.(Netherlands)

Grupp, H (1993), Technologie am Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts,Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg. (Germany)

Grupp, H (I 995), Der Delphi-Report: Innovationenfiir unsere Zukunft,Deutsche Verlags- Anstalt, Stuttgart. (Germany)

Loveridge D, Georghiou L, Nedeva M ( 995), United Kingdom Technology ForesightProgramme: Delphi Survey, HMSO, London. (United Kingdom)

Minister of Research, Science & Technology (MORST) (1994), Science &Technology: The Way Forward, 1996-2001, MORST, Wellington. (New Zealand)

MORST, (1995, Reprinted 1997), Public Investment in Strategic Science andtechnology: A Review of directions Through to the Year 2001, MORST,Wellington. (New Zealand)

Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche (1995), Enquete surles Technologies du Futur par la Methode Delphia: Presentation des ResultatSynthese et Commentaires, BETA, CNRS, Universite' Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg.(France)

Ministere de l'Industrie (1996), Les Technologies Cles pour l'industriesFrancaise a L'Horizon  2000, Ministere de L'Industrie, Paris. (France)

National Institute of Science and Technology Policy (NISTEP) (1992), The FifthTechnology Forecast Survey- Future Technology in Japan, NISTEP Report No. 25,Science and Technology Agency, Tokyo. (Japan)

NISTEP and Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (FhG ISI)(1994), Outlook for Japanese and German Future Technology: Comparing Japaneseand German Technology Forecast Surveys, NISTEP Report No. 33, Science andTechnology Agency, Tokyo. (Germany/Japan)

NISTEP and FhG ISI (1995), International Development of TechnologyForecasting, Conference Papers, Science and Technology Agency, Tokyo.(Germany/Japan)

Netherlands Ministry of Economic Affairs (1990), Opportunities for DutchIndustry in Adhesion and bonding, Arthur D. Little Report, The Hague.(Netherlands)

O'Laughlin, C (1996), Evaluation of 1994-95 Priority-Setting Process for thePublic Good Science Fund, prepared for MORST, Report No. 45, MORST,Wellington. (New Zealand)

Schaffers H, Kuijper J, Jacobs D. and Smits R (1995), DeNederlandseKennisportfolio op het gebeid van de technische en natuurwetenschappenen de belangrijkste technologiegebieden-achtergrondstudie, TNO, in opdrachtvan overlegcommissie verkenningen, Amsterdam. (Netherlands)

Science Priorities Review Panel (I 995), Priorities for 2001: Public GoodScience Investment, MORST, Wellington. (New Zealand)

Segal Quince Wicksteed Limited and Programme for Policy Research inEngineering,  Science and Technology (1 994), Feedback on Foresight.-Results of Consultations on the Approach to UK Technology Foresight, SegalQuince Wicksteed Limited, Cambridge.(United Kingdom)

Strategic Consultative Group on Research (1994), For the Public GoodDirections for Investment through the Public Good Science Fund, StrategicStatement. (New Zealand)

U.K. Office of Science and Technology (1995), Progress through Partnership:Report from the Steering Group of the Technology Foresight Program 1995,Office of Science and  Technology, HMSO, London. (United Kingdom)

U.K. Office of Science and Technology (1995), Progress through Partnership:Key Points, Summary Leaflets of 15 Sectoral Reports, HMSO, London.(United Kingdom).

U.K. Office of Science and Technology (1995), Progress Through PartnershipSectoral Reports, HMSO, London (United Kingdom).

  1. Chemicals
  2. Construction
  3. Financial Services
  4. Health and Life Sciences
  5. Transport
  6. Communications
  7. Food and Drink
  8. IT & Electronics
  9. Manufacturing, Production and Business Processes
  10. Materials
  11. Agriculture, Natural Resources and Environment
  12. Defence and Aerospace
  13. Energy
  14. Leisure and learning
  15. Retail and distribution

U.K. Office of Science and Technology (1996), Winning through Foresight: AStrategy Taking the Foresight Programme to the Millennium, Office of Scienceand Technology, London. (United Kingdom)

U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy (1995), National CriticalTechnologies Report, National Critical Technologies Panel, OSTP, Washington.(United States)


S&T Policy Institute Home  |   RAND Infrastructure, Safety, and Environment  |  RAND Home

Please forward all questions about our work to the Director of ISE .