Document Information
How Should the Army Use Contractors on the Battlefield?
Assessing Comparative Risk in Sourcing Decisions
Can the Army improve the way it measures the risks of using civilian contractors in combat? This report proposes a method for comparing the “residual risks” of using military and contract sources to perform specific support activities on the battlefield. It applies the Army’s standard approach to risk assessment, which identifies sources of risk, or “threat”; the risks the threats present; the opportunities to mitigate these risks; and the risk that remains-the residual risk-when the Army chooses a particular course of action to mitigate risks. The approach considers choices of military and contract sources, with appropriate mitigation strategies, as alternative courses of action and compares the residual risks associated with each choice. The approach offers an orderly way to translate relative inherent capabilities of military and contract sources, terms of applicable status-of-forces agreements, and threats at any particular place and time on the battlefield into a comparison of the residual risks associated with military outcomes, the safety of contract personnel, resource costs, and other policy factors of greatest importance outside a particular contingency setting.
See Also:
Support RAND Research — Buy This Product!
Paperback Cover Price: $24.00
Discounted Web Price: $21.60
Pages: 246
ISBN/EAN: 0-8330-3736-6
Free, downloadable PDF file(s) are available below.
RAND makes an electronic version of this document available for free as a public service. If you find this information valuable, please consider purchasing a paper copy of the full document to help support RAND research.
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 7.0 or higher for the best experience.
Contents
Chapter One:
Introduction
Chapter Two:
A Standard Way to Assess the Risks of Using Contractors on the Battlefield: An Overview
Chapter Three:
Using Risk Considerations to Frame a Sourcing Decision: Analytic Preliminaries
Chapter Four:
Using Risk Considerations to Frame a Sourcing Decision: Analytic Preliminaries
Chapter Five:
Using Risk Considerations to Frame a Traditional Sourcing Decision
Chapter Six:
Using Risk Considerations to Examine Changes in Nonsourcing Policies with Sourcing Implications
Chapter Seven:
Where to Address the Risks of Using Contractors on the Battlefield
Chapter Eight:
Summary and Conclusions
Appendix:
- Recent Policy Developments Relevant to the Use of Contractors on the Battlefield
- Risks That Increase with Contractor Use on the Battlefield
- Using Contractors to Reduce Risks on the Battlefield
- How the Approach Proposed Here Compares with Alternative Approaches
- Measuring the Readiness of Contract Services
The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Army and conducted by the RAND Arroyo Center.
This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research organization providing objective analysis and effective solutions that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors around the world. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.
* RAND research is conducted across divisions, centers, and projects; these organizational components are represented in the "Related RAND Divisions" section above.


Top