No Child Left Behind and Student Achievement
Selected Research, Commentary and Congressional Testimony
Five Key Education Priorities for the Obama Administration — Apr. 8, 2009
A set of five policy briefs address key education priorities for the Obama administration and the 111th Congress. Each brief summarizes the current research on the topic and the implications for federal policymakers.
Read More
Education Research Area
Charter School Students in Chicago Enjoy Better Graduation, College Entry Rates — May 7, 2008
Chicago's multi-grade charter high schools (those serving students in grades 7-12, 6-12 or K-12) appear to improve their students' chances of graduating and attending college, as compared with the city's traditional public high schools.
Full Document
Superseding Document
What are the Costs and Benefits of Out-of-School-Time Youth Programs? — Feb. 29, 2008
Evaluation of youth programs offered during the time that students are not in school shows that the programs that are costlier and provide more-intense resources to youth perform the best.
Full Document
Child Policy Research Area
No Child Left Behind Panel Discussion — Feb. 25, 2008
In a panel discussion hosted by the RAND Corporation, RAND researchers and experts in the field made observations on the implementation and effectiveness of No Child Left Behind. Audio of the event is available online.
Listen to the Audio
Child Policy Research Area
RAND Review, Fall 2007: Passing or Failing — Dec. 20, 2007
The Fall 2007 issue of RAND Review presents a midterm report card for "No Child Left Behind", discusses drug benefit plans driven by short-term savings, and analyzes the threat of ungoverned territories.
Full Document
RAND Review Home
Revamp NCLB to Fulfill Its Promise — Sep. 16, 2007
Research reveals that NCLB has flaws, but changes can be made that preserve its basic goals of school accountability and student improvement, writes Brian Stecher.
Commentary
Education Research Area
The Limits of Average Test Scores — May 11, 2007
[State] test scores provide one useful piece of information to parents, school and governmental officials, and other taxpayers... But while this type of reporting provides one way of judging school quality, other information is needed to understand how well schools are actually educating their students, writes Laura Hamilton.
Commentary
Education Research Area
Think It Through on Tests — Mar. 27, 2007
While testing can serve a valuable purpose, it can only do so if: the tests are designed to measure complex, important content; safeguards are developed to address harmful effects on students; and the tests are used as one part of a comprehensive strategy for producing more-qualified graduates, writes Laura Hamilton.
Commentary
Making Sense of Data-Driven Decision Making in Education — Nov. 27, 2006
Data-driven decision making, applied to student achievement testing data, is a central focus of many school and district reform efforts. Yet many unanswered questions remain about the use of data to inform decisions and the effects on student achievement.
Full Document
Education Research Area
'No Child' Leaves Too Much Behind — Sep. 13, 2006
The No Child Left Behind law focuses on a very narrow set of outcomes, and ignores many elements that students and their families find satisfying, challenging and motivating about their schools, writes Brian Stecher.
Commentary
Education Research Area